{"id":3916,"date":"2022-01-11T19:51:02","date_gmt":"2022-01-11T19:51:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/?p=3916"},"modified":"2022-01-11T19:51:02","modified_gmt":"2022-01-11T19:51:02","slug":"critical-analyses-on-the-decision-of-international-criminal-court-on-the-case-over-the-prosecutor-versus-germain-katanga","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/?p=3916","title":{"rendered":"Critical Analyses on the Decision of International Criminal Court on the Case over the PROSECUTOR versus GERMAIN KATANGA"},"content":{"rendered":"<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/4-Petros-Fanta-Choramo-Critical-Analyses-on-the-Decision-of-International-Criminal-Court-on-the-Case-over-the-PROSECUTOR-versus-GERMAIN-KATANGA.pdf\" class=\"pdfemb-viewer\" style=\"\" data-width=\"max\" data-height=\"max\" data-mobile-width=\"500\"  data-scrollbar=\"none\" data-download=\"on\" data-tracking=\"on\" data-newwindow=\"on\" data-pagetextbox=\"off\" data-scrolltotop=\"off\" data-startzoom=\"100\" data-startfpzoom=\"100\" data-toolbar=\"bottom\" data-toolbar-fixed=\"off\">4 Petros Fanta Choramo - Critical Analyses on the Decision of International Criminal Court on the Case over the PROSECUTOR versus GERMAIN KATANGA<br\/><\/a>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\"><\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3916"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3916"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3916\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3917,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3916\/revisions\/3917"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}