{"id":4918,"date":"2023-01-09T19:21:47","date_gmt":"2023-01-09T16:21:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/?p=4918"},"modified":"2023-01-09T19:21:47","modified_gmt":"2023-01-09T16:21:47","slug":"tchitcherine-resiste-aux-decisions-du-politburo-lattitude-de-la-delegation-sovietique-a-la-conference-de-lausanne-est-elle-un-exemple-de-prise-dinitiative-une-evaluation-du-point-de-vue-de-la","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/?p=4918","title":{"rendered":"TCHITCHERINE R\u00c9SISTE AUX D\u00c9CISIONS DU POLITBURO: L&#8217;ATTITUDE DE LA D\u00c9L\u00c9GATION SOVI\u00c9TIQUE \u00c0 LA CONF\u00c9RENCE DE LAUSANNE EST-ELLE UN EXEMPLE DE PRISE D&#8217;INITIATIVE ? (UNE \u00c9VALUATION DU POINT DE VUE DE LA TURQUIE) &#8211; MUSTAFA KO\u00c7"},"content":{"rendered":"<a href=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/VOL8-2-2-2022-KO-CHICHERIN-RESISTS-POLITBURO-DECISIONS.pdf\" class=\"pdfemb-viewer\" style=\"\" data-width=\"max\" data-height=\"max\" data-mobile-width=\"500\"  data-scrollbar=\"none\" data-download=\"on\" data-tracking=\"on\" data-newwindow=\"on\" data-pagetextbox=\"off\" data-scrolltotop=\"off\" data-startzoom=\"100\" data-startfpzoom=\"100\" data-toolbar=\"bottom\" data-toolbar-fixed=\"off\">VOL8-2-2-2022- KO?- CHICHERIN RESISTS POLITBURO DECISIONS<br\/><\/a>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"mh-excerpt\"><\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4918"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4918"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4918\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4919,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4918\/revisions\/4919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/e-journaloflaw.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}